Stress management in livestock

ABSTRACT

A method for minimising or preventing the induction of stress-related or stress-induced inappetance or inanition in an animal selected for a marketing or management practice.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.15/038,261, having a 371(c) date of May 20, 2016, which is a nationalstage entry of PCT Application Number PCT/AU2014/050362, filed Nov. 20,2014, which claims priority to Australian Application Number 2013904516,filed Nov. 20, 2013, which are all incorporated by reference in theirentirety herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to prevention of stress in livestock, especiallyruminant animals.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many of the management practices to which livestock and ruminant animalsare subjected can be potent physiological and psychological stressorsthat impact on the performance of the animal. Common on-farm husbandrypractices including tail docking, marking, mulesing, castration anddehorning are of particular concern, as are a number of other managementpractices including weaning, transport, feedlot integration and otherintegration practices leading to mixing of unfamiliar animals, releaseof animals into an unfamiliar environment or into confined conditions,or presentation with unfamiliar feeds.

One manifestation of these stressors is inanition, otherwise known asexhaustion resulting from lack of nourishment. In particular, ruminantanimals, which are highly susceptible to development of stress-inducedconditions such as anxiety, tend to reduce their nutrient intake(resulting in inappetance), and leading to inanition and reduced growthperformance and productivity. This is particularly seen in transport oflive animals, especially in live export, and in the introduction ofanimals into feedlots for finishing.

There have been a number of approaches to addressing the problem. Manyof these have generally focussed on treatment of animals that have beenexposed to stressors, and with no particular focus on preparing ananimal prior to implementation of a management practice so that, asprepared, the animal is then less susceptible to the stressors arisingfrom, or associated with, the relevant practice.

There remains a need to minimise stress-induced inanition in livestockproduction (for example by minimising, or reducing the likelihood of,inappetance), and in particular in the management and marketing ofruminant animals.

There is a particular need to minimise stress-induced inanition inanimals selected for husbandry procedures, including mulesing, taildocking, marking and castration, as well as dehorning in cattle anddeer, and any act of veterinary science either separate to, or inconjunction with, husbandry procedures.

There is also a need to minimise stress-induced inanition in animalsselected for transport, including transport for other than slaughterpurposes, and including live export.

There is also a need to minimise stress-induced inanition in animalsselected for feedlot integration.

Reference to any prior art in the specification is not an acknowledgmentor suggestion that this prior art forms part of the common generalknowledge in any jurisdiction or that this prior art could reasonably beexpected to be understood, regarded as relevant, and/or combined withother pieces of prior art by a skilled person in the art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention seeks to address one or more of the above mentionedproblems or needs, and in one embodiment provides for the treatment orpreparation of an animal. The preparation of the animal is implementedprior to subjecting the animal to a marketing or management practice.This prior implementation minimises or prevents the induction of stressor anxiety-related inanition in the animal during, or at completion of,the practice. The preparation involves the administration of aformulation including bromide. The bromide is provided in an amounteffective for preventing the animal from reducing feed intake, or moregenerally, from exhibiting reduced growth or productivity from lack ofnourishment.

In one embodiment, the invention provides a method for the preparationof an animal prior to subjecting the animal to a marketing or managementpractice, thereby minimising or preventing the induction of stress oranxiety-related inanition in the animal during, or at completion of, thepractice, the method including the step of administering a formulationincluding bromide to an animal selected for the marketing or managementpractice in an amount effective for preventing the animal from reducingfeed intake.

In one embodiment, the invention provides a method for preparation of ananimal for a marketing or management practice, thereby minimising orpreventing the induction of stress or anxiety-related inanition in theanimal during, or at completion of, the practice, the method includingthe step of administering a formulation including bromide to an animalselected for the marketing or management practice in an amount effectivefor preventing the animal from reducing feed intake.

In certain embodiments, the invention provides a method for preparing ananimal for a husbandry procedure so as to minimise the likelihood of theanimal developing stress or anxiety-related inanition subsequent to theprocedure, the method including:

providing bromide to an animal that has been selected for a husbandryprocedure in an amount sufficient for minimising the development ofstress or anxiety-related inanition in the animal;

thereby preparing the animal for the husbandry procedure.

In another embodiment, the invention provides a method for preparing ananimal for transport so as to minimise the likelihood of the animaldeveloping stress or anxiety-related inanition during or subsequent totransport, the method including:

providing bromide to an animal that has been selected for transport inan amount sufficient for minimising the development of stress oranxiety-related inanition in the animal;

thereby preparing the animal for transport.

In a further embodiment, the invention provides a method for preparingan animal for feedlot integration so as to minimise the likelihood ofthe animal developing stress or anxiety-related inanition subsequent tofeedlot integration, the method including:

providing bromide to an animal that has been selected for feedlotintegration in an amount sufficient for minimising the development ofstress or anxiety-related inanition in the animal;

thereby preparing the animal for feedlot integration.

In the above described methods, in one embodiment, the animal to whichthe invention is applied does not have stress or anxiety-relatedinanition or inappetance at the time of administration of theformulation. For example, the feed intake or growth performance of theanimal up to the time of administration of the formulation is generallyconsidered to have been normal in the context of the relevant age,physiology and environment pertaining to the animal.

In further embodiments there are provided compositions and kits suitablefor use in the above described methods.

In one embodiment, the animal is a ruminant (e.g. ovine or bovine).

Further aspects of the present invention and further embodiments of theaspects described in the preceding paragraphs will become apparent fromthe following description, given by way of example and with reference tothe accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. Freezing response episodes in C57/Bl6, 4 month old male micegiven oral potassium bromide 250 mg/L (n=9) or normal drinking water(n=5) for 7 days prior novel arena testing.

FIG. 2. Parallel Rod touches in C57/Bl6, 4 month old male mice givenoral potassium bromide 250 mg/L (n=9) or normal drinking water (n=5) for7 days prior to testing.

FIG. 3. Weight gain in C57/Bl6, 4 month old male mice given oralpotassium bromide 250 mg/L (n=5) or normal drinking water (n=5) for 7days under mildly stressful management conditions.

FIG. 4. Serum concentrations (mean±SD) of bromide after intravenousadministration to eight sheep at a dose of 120 mg/kg.

FIG. 5. Serum concentrations (mean±SD) of bromide after oraladministration to eight sheep at a dose of 120 mg/kg.

FIG. 6. Merino ewe lamb after mulesing and tail docking procedure.

FIG. 7. Merino ewe lambs mean weight gain over time after mulesing andtail docking (bromide animals received 300 mg/kg LW oral potassiumbromide immediately prior to the procedure; n=20 in both control andbromide groups).

FIG. 8. Merino ewe lambs mean weight change over time after mulesing andtail docking (bromide animals received 300 mg/kg LW oral bromide, as thepotassium salt, immediately prior to the procedure; n=20 in both controland bromide groups).

FIG. 9. Merino ewe lambs mean weight gain per head/day after mulesingand tail docking (n=20 in both control and bromide groups).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

As described herein, the inventors have found that bromide may be usedprophylactically to prevent an animal from developing stress-induced orstress-related inanition or related eating disorders arising from orassociated with a reduced nutrient intake (inappetance being an example)after the animal has been subjected to a management or marketingpractice, such as a husbandry practice, transport or feedlot integrationpractice, other acts of veterinary science, or a combination of theabove.

While not wanting to be bound by hypothesis, the inventors believe thatthe utility of bromide in the invention arises from the interaction ofbromide with the nervous system which desensitises the animal to stressinsults arising from the relevant procedure, or which otherwisedecreases the animal's perception of these stress insults.

In accordance with the invention, in one embodiment there is provided amethod for the preparation of an animal prior to subjecting the animalto a marketing or management practice, thereby minimising or preventingthe induction of stress or anxiety-related inanition in the animalduring, or at completion of, the practice. The method includes the stepof administering a formulation including bromide to an animal selectedfor the marketing or management practice in an amount effective forpreventing the animal from reducing feed intake, or from exhibitingreduced growth or productivity from lack of nourishment.

According to the invention, the relevant stress is that generallyarising from farming practices, including management and marketingpractices that the animal is routinely subjected to. In some contextsthe stress may be referred to as ‘ante mortem’ stress which is generallyunderstood to be stress that occurs pre-slaughter, and also more broadlyin across the animal production lifecycle. Examples of relevant stressinclude stress resulting from transport, holding, handling, containment,changes in feed or environment, mixing with unfamiliar animals and otherlike management practices relevant to livestock animals. Stress arisingfrom transport, feedlot integration and other integration practicesleading to mixing of unfamiliar animals, or release of animals into anunfamiliar environment are of particular concern, as is stress arisingfrom husbandry practices such as mulesing, tail docking, dehorning,castration and marking procedures, and any other act of veterinaryscience.

In one embodiment, the marketing or management practice is a husbandrypractice.

In accordance with the invention, there is provided a method forpreparing an animal for a husbandry practice so as to minimise thelikelihood of the animal developing stress or anxiety-related inanitionsubsequent to, or during, the practice, the method including:

providing bromide to an animal that has been selected for a husbandrypractice in an amount sufficient for minimising the development ofstress or anxiety-related inanition in the animal;

thereby preparing the animal for the husbandry practice.

In one embodiment, the husbandry practice is mulesing, marking,castration or dehorning.

In one embodiment, the marketing or management practice is animaltransport.

Accordingly, the invention also provides a method for preparing ananimal for transport so as to minimise the likelihood of the animaldeveloping stress or anxiety-related inanition during or subsequent totransport, the method including:

providing bromide to an animal that has been selected for transport inan amount sufficient for minimising the development of stress oranxiety-related inanition in the animal;

thereby preparing the animal for transport.

In one embodiment, marketing or management practice is introduction ofthe animal into a feedlot.

Accordingly, the invention also provides a method for preparing ananimal for feedlot integration so as to minimise the likelihood of theanimal developing stress or anxiety-related inanition subsequent tofeedlot integration, the method including:

providing bromide to an animal that has been selected for feedlotintegration in an amount sufficient for minimising the development ofstress or anxiety-related inanition in the animal;

thereby preparing the animal for feedlot integration.

Typically an animal to which the invention is applied does not havestress or anxiety-related inanition or inappetance at the time ofadministration of the formulation. For example, the feed intake orgrowth performance of the animal up to the time of administration of theformulation is generally considered to have been normal in the contextof the relevant age, physiology and environment pertaining to theanimal.

In one embodiment, the animal does not have a movement disorder such asan abnormal gait, or a disorder arising from grass toxicosis, at thetime of administration of the formulation.

As used herein, the term “preparation” or “preparing” refers to the useof the bromide in a prophylactic or preventative sense. That is,preparing an animal for a marketing or management practice involvesadministering bromide (or a formulation including bromide) to the animalbefore it is subjected to the marketing or management practice so as tominimise, or reduce, or prevent the stress or anxiety-related inanitionthat the animal would otherwise experience in the absence of saidpreparation. Successful preparation of the animal will be achieved whenthe animal's normal feed intake is not significantly reduced oraffected, or where the animal does not become significantly exhausted,disabled, or does not exhibit reduced productivity from lack ofnourishment. For example, the animal's growth performance will not besignificantly affected (e.g. the animal's weight, reproductiveperformance and/or milk production will remain around normal levels orincrease).

As used herein, the term “animal” refers to domestic ruminant andmonogastric animals, including swine, horses, cattle, bison, sheep,deer, moose, elk, caribou and goats, of any age.

In one embodiment, the animal is a ruminant. Preferred ruminants includeovine (i.e. sheep) and bovine (i.e. cattle). In one embodiment, theanimal is not an equine. The invention is also not intended to coverhumans. Therefore, in one embodiment, the animal is not a human.

As used herein, “bromide” refers to the bromine ion (Br⁻). It will beunderstood by a person skilled in the art that bromide will generally beadministered to the animal in the form of a salt and/or other compoundwith a bromine group that readily dissociates in situ and/or in vivo togive bromide. Preferably, the bromide is in the form of a salt, whichmay contain an alkali metal or alkaline earth metal. For example, thebromide may be in the form of potassium bromide, sodium bromide ormagnesium bromide. Potassium bromide and magnesium bromide areparticularly useful for oral administration and sodium bromide is usefulfor intravenous administration. Magnesium bromide has a higherpercentage of bromide than both the potassium and sodium salts, andpossesses much greater water solubility than both the potassium andsodium salts. Consequently, magnesium bromide solutions can be made atmuch higher bromide concentrations than other salts, before saturationis reached. This property of the magnesium salt of bromide impacts onformulation; low volume delivery is practically and economicallyadvantageous.

In one embodiment, bromide is provided in an amount of about 10 to about750 mg/kg animal weight per dose. For example, the bromide may beprovided in an amount of from about 20 to about 600 mg/kg animal weightper dose (e.g. from about 30 to about 500 mg/kg animal weight, fromabout 50 to about 400 mg/kg animal weight or from about 100 mg/kg toabout 300 mg/kg animal weight). In one embodiment, the bromide isprovided in an amount of about 300 mg/kg animal weight per dose.

Bromide may be provided in an amount of about 10 mg/kg, about 20 mg/kg,about 50 mg/kg, about 75 mg/kg, about 100 mg/kg, about 120 mg/kg, about150 mg/kg, about 200 mg/kg, about 250 mg/kg, about 300 mg/kg, about 350mg/kg, about 400 mg/kg, about 450 mg/kg, about 500 mg/kg, about 550mg/kg, about 600 mg/kg, about 650 mg/kg, about 700 mg/kg or about 750mg/kg per dose.

In one embodiment, the bromide (e.g. in a formulation including bromide)is administered in an amount to provide an animal with about 10 to about500 mg/kg animal weight of bromide. For example, the bromide may be inan amount to provide the animal with from about 20 to about 600 mg/kganimal weight (e.g. from about 30 to about 500 mg/kg animal weight, orfrom about 50 to about 400 mg/kg animal weight) of bromide. In oneembodiment, the bromide is in an amount to provide an animal with about300 mg/kg animal weight of bromide.

Bromide (e.g. in a formulation including bromide) may be administered inan amount to provide an animal with about 10 mg/kg, about 20 mg/kg,about 50 mg/kg, about 75 mg/kg, about 100 mg/kg, about 120 mg/kg, about150 mg/kg, about 200 mg/kg, about 250 mg/kg, about 300 mg/kg, about 350mg/kg, about 400 mg/kg, about 450 mg/kg, about 500 mg/kg, about 550mg/kg, about 600 mg/kg, about 650 mg/kg, about 700 mg/kg or about 750mg/kg animal weight of bromide.

It will be understood that the specific dose level of bromide for anyparticular animal may depend upon a variety of factors including theactivity of the specific bromide employed, the age, body weight, generalhealth, sex and/or diet of the animal, time of administration, route ofadministration, and rate of excretion, drug or supplement combination(i.e. other drugs or supplements being used concomitantly with thebromide), and the severity of the stress being exhibited, if being usedas a treatment.

In one embodiment, bromide is the only active in the formulation. In oneembodiment, bromide is the only active provided to the animal.Therefore, in one embodiment, the method of the present invention doesnot include providing therapeutic or nutritive agents, other thanbromide, to the animal. Examples of such agents include electrolytes(e.g. sodium, potassium, magnesium, manganese, chromium, and calcium,and chloride, oxide, carbonate and aspartate salts thereof), amino acids(or salts thereof), and sources of energy (e.g. sugar).

Typically the formulation is provided once daily for a period of one dayto no more than about four weeks prior to the time the animal issubjected to the marketing or management practice. In one embodiment,the formulation is provided once prior to subjecting the animal to amarketing or management practice. The formulation may be providedimmediately prior to subjecting the animal to a marketing or managementpractice, or may be provided from one to 24 hours prior to subjectingthe animal to a marketing or management practice.

In another embodiment, bromide is not given on or after completion ofthe marketing or management practice.

A dose of a bromide-containing formulation of the invention may bedelivered at once, for example, as a bolus, or over the course ofseveral hours.

Theoretically there is no maximum limit for the dosage provided that thebromide does not accrue in the animal to a point whereby it diminishesthe quality of the animal or products therefrom.

The bromide may be provided in the form of a formulation adapted fordelivery by an animal handler, or for consumption by the animal.Examples are described further herein.

In one embodiment, the invention provides a formulation for use inpreventing the induction of stress or anxiety-related inanition in ananimal during, or at completion of, a marketing or management practiceon an animal selected for the practice, the formulation includingbromide in an amount for preventing the induction of stress oranxiety-related inanition in the animal, the formulation foradministration to the animal, prior to subjecting the animal to thepractice, in any of the embodiments described in the specification.

In one embodiment, the method includes a further step of administering aformulation including bromide to the animal at completion of themarketing or management practice, or thereafter. It will be understoodthat in this embodiment the animal selected for the relevant procedurefirst receives the bromide formulation before the relevant procedure. Atthe completion of the procedure, the animal may then receive furtherbromide for a pre-determined period. In this embodiment, typically theformulation is provided daily for a period of one day to no more thanfour weeks from completion of the marketing or management practice.

The formulation may be provided in a range of forms depending on theroute of administration required. For example, the formulation may beadapted for injection intravenously, intramuscularly or subcutaneously,for oral, topical, ocular or nasal delivery, or for anal or vaginaldelivery. Preferably the formulation is administered orally orintravenously. Accordingly, preferably, the formulation is provided inthe form of a drench, or in the form of an injectable compositionadapted for intravenous injection of the formulation.

In one embodiment, the formulation includes, in addition to the bromide,one or more pharmaceutically-acceptable excipients, such as binders,disintegrants, dispersants, lubricants, colours, flavours, coatings,glidants, sorbents, absorption-enhancing agents, emulsifiers,surfactants, buffers, bulking agents, tonicity-adjusting agents,preservatives, wetting agents, solvents, and sweeteners. Suitableexamples of excipients to include in formulations for use in theinvention are well-known to a person skilled in the art.

Suitable formulations for use in the present invention include drenches,gels, pastes, tablet/bolus formulations, gelatin capsules, injectableformulations, or intraruminal devices for slow release of the active.

In one embodiment the invention provides a drench including bromide,wherein the drench includes bromide in an amount to provide an animalwith about 20 to about 500 mg bromide/kg animal weight of bromide. Inone embodiment, the drench includes bromide in an amount to provide ananimal with about 20 to about 400 mg/kg animal weight (e.g. from about30 to about 300 mg/kg animal weight, or from about 50 to about 400 mg/kganimal weight) of bromide. In one embodiment, the drench includesbromide in an amount to provide an animal with about 300 mg/kg animalweight of bromide.

In one embodiment, the drench includes bromide in an amount to providean animal with about 20 mg/kg, about 50 mg/kg, about 75 mg/kg, about 100mg/kg, about 120 mg/kg, about 150 mg/kg, about 200 mg/kg, about 250mg/kg, about 300 mg/kg, about 350 mg/kg, about 400 mg/kg, about 450mg/kg or about 500 mg/kg animal weight of bromide.

Preferred drenches are those adapted for use in a ruminant animal,particularly sheep (ovine) or cattle (bovine). Preferably theconcentration of bromide in the drench is from about 5 to about 70% w/v(liquid or paste formulation) and about 5 to about 70% w/w (powder orsolid formulation). In one embodiment, the concentration of bromide inthe drench is from about 10 to about 60%, from about 20 to about 50%, orfrom about 30 to about 40% w/v or w/w. In one embodiment, theconcentration of bromide in the drench is about 5, about 10, about 20,about 30, about 40, about 50, about 60 or about 70% w/v or w/w.

In one embodiment, the only active in the drench is bromide.

In one embodiment, the drench is adapted for use in a monogastricanimal.

In another embodiment the invention provides an injectable formulationincluding bromide, wherein the formulation includes bromide in an amountto provide an animal with about 10 to about 500 mg/kg animal weight ofbromide. In one embodiment, the injectable formulation includes bromidein an amount to provide an animal with about 20 to about 400 mg/kganimal weight (e.g. from about 30 to about 300 mg/kg animal weight, orfrom about 50 to about 400 mg/kg animal weight) of bromide. In oneembodiment, the injectable formulation includes bromide in an amount toprovide an animal with about 300 mg/kg animal weight of bromide.

In one embodiment, the injectable formulation includes bromide in anamount to provide an animal with about 10 mg/kg, about 20 mg/kg, about50 mg/kg, about 75 mg/kg, about 100 mg/kg, about 120 mg/kg, about 150mg/kg, about 200 mg/kg, about 250 mg/kg, about 300 mg/kg, about 350mg/kg, about 400 mg/kg, about 450 mg/kg or about 500 mg/kg animal weightof bromide.

Preferably the formulation is adapted for application to a ruminantanimal, such as sheep (ovine) or cattle (bovine). Preferably theconcentration of bromide is from 5 to 70% to (w/v). In one embodiment,the concentration of bromide in the formulation is from about 10 toabout 60%, from about 20 to about 50%, or from about 30 to about 40%w/v. In one embodiment, the concentration of bromide in the formulationis about 5, about 10, about 20, about 30, about 40, about 50, about 60or about 70% w/v.

In one embodiment, the only active in the injectable formulation isbromide.

The drench or injectable formulation may be provided in the form of akit including written instructions enabling use of the kit in a methoddescribed above. In one embodiment, the invention provides a kitincluding a drench, as described herein, and written instructionsenabling use of the kit in a method described herein. In one embodiment,the invention provides a kit including an injectable formulation, asdescribed herein, and written instructions enabling use of the kit in amethod described herein.

In one embodiment, the invention also provides use of bromide in themanufacture of a formulation for minimising or preventing the inductionof stress or anxiety-related inanition in an animal during, or atcompletion of, a marketing or management practice, the formulation foradministration to the animal selected for marketing or managementpractice, prior to subjecting the animal to the practice.

In one embodiment, the invention also provides a formulation for use inpreventing the induction of stress or anxiety-related inanition in ananimal during, or at completion of, a marketing or management practiceon an animal selected for the practice, the formulation includingbromide in an amount for preventing the induction of stress oranxiety-related inanition in the animal, the formulation foradministration to the animal, prior to subjecting the animal to thepractice.

In one embodiment, the invention also provides a formulation when usedin a method of preventing the induction of stress or anxiety-relatedinanition in an animal during, or at completion of a marketing ormanagement practice on an animal selected for the practice, theformulation including bromide in an amount for preventing the inductionof stress or anxiety-related inanition in the animal, the formulationfor administration to the animal, prior to subjecting the animal to thepractice.

In one embodiment, the invention also provides a formulation having anactive ingredient for use in a method of preventing the stress oranxiety-related inanition in an animal during, or at completion of, amarketing or management practice on an animal selected for the practice,wherein the active ingredient is bromide and wherein the bromide ispresent in an amount for preventing the induction of stress oranxiety-related inanition in the animal, the formulation foradministration to the animal, prior to subjecting the animal to thepractice.

In one embodiment, the invention also provides the use of a formulationcontaining bromide in preventing the induction of stress oranxiety-related inanition in an animal during, or at completion of, amarketing or management practice on an animal selected for the practice,wherein the active ingredient is bromide and wherein the bromide ispresent in an amount for preventing the induction of stress oranxiety-related inanition in the animal, the formulation foradministration to the animal, prior to subjecting the animal to thepractice, such as described herein.

In an alternative embodiment, the bromide may be provided in the form ofa supplement in liquid (e.g. an aqueous solution) or solid form that isto be consumed by the animal. The bromide may be dissolved in theanimal's drinking water for the animal to consume. The bromide may beincorporated into animal feed as a means to administer the bromide tothe animal and/or encourage the animal to consume the bromide. Animalfeed includes any food that the animal is capable of ingesting and ifdesired, any additional ingestable materials. For example, it couldinclude grass, plant extracts, vitamins, minerals, feed supplements andother such materials.

In one embodiment, bromide is provided with feed in an amount of betweenabout 0.01 to about 5% w/w dry matter. For example, bromide may beprovided in an amount of between about 0.5 and about 4% or about 1 andabout 3% w/w dry matter. In one embodiment, the concentration of bromidein feed is about 0.01, about 0.1, about 0.2, about 0.5, about 1, about2, about 3, about 4 or about 5% w/w dry matter.

The bromide may be administered with another medication (e.g. anantibiotic), a growth promotant or incorporated into a mineral pre-mix.Suitable amounts of bromide in this regard include between about 0.1 andabout 60% w/w dry weight. For example, bromide may be provided in anamount of between about 0.5 and about 50%, about 1 and about 40%, about5 and about 30% or about 10 and about 20% w/w dry weight. In oneembodiment, the concentration of bromide is about 0.1, about 0.2, about0.5, about 1, about 2, about 5, about 10, about 15, about 20, about 25,about 30, about 35, about 45, about 50, about 55 or about 60% w/w drymatter.

It will be evident that, given the variable consumption of solids andliquids by animals, the amount of bromide in a consumable composition asstated above is approximate and may be varied depending on the type offormulation (solid v. liquid), the solubility of the bromide, the bodyweight of the animal and the average solid and liquid intake of theanimal. Supplements may be provided with carriers, or may be formulatedinto feed with binders. Exemplary carriers include grain or grassby-products, such as oats, barley, wheat, canola, rye, sorgum, millet,corn, legumes and grasses.

Typically, an animal treated by the method of the invention disclosedherein retains a normal feed intake subsequent to the marketing ormanagement practice. It may be possible to further modify that feedintake by providing an appetite stimulant to the animal, prior to,during or after the completion of the marketing or management practice.

In one embodiment, the present invention includes the further step ofproviding an appetite stimulant to the animal prior to, during, or afterthe completion of the marketing or management practice.

EXAMPLE 1 Bromide Decreases Stress-Induced Inanition in Stress TreatedRodents

Monitoring Stress and Anxiety Behaviours in Rodents

A model system was established to induce stress in rodents by repeatedbehavioural testing using the AnyMaze™ rodent behavioural monitoringsystem. To determine the effects of bromide on these animals, age, sexand strain matched animals were treated for 7 days with 250 mg/Lpotassium bromide in drinking water and subjected to mild stressors suchas handling and weighing. At the end of 7 days animals were subjected toa number of behavioural tests to assess level of stress. Weight gain wasalso analysed in the treatment group by recording body weight over theinitial 7 day period.

Results: Animals treated with bromide showed a trend towards decreasedfreezing response episodes (a behavioural stress response) and increasedweight gain over the trial period (7 days)

Conclusions and clinical relevance: These data support potassium bromideas an efficacious therapeutic treatment to alleviate stress relatedbehaviours and increase appetite in animals suffering from stress.

Materials and Methods

Determination of a Mild Stress Model in Rodents

C57Bl6/Ola male mice at 5 weeks of age were purchased from MAS ClientServices, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Animals were weighedat the start of the test period and daily for the duration of testing.Potassium bromide was administered in drinking water to 5 animals for 7days at 250 mg/L, 5 control animals received water alone.

Behavioural Testing

Animals were weighed 3 times during the experiment (7 days). To initiatea mildly stressful situation, animals were exposed to novel arena,parallel rod and tremor tests using the mouse AnyMaze™ system (AnyMaze™,Stoelting, U.S.A.).

Novel Arena

Animals were placed in the centre of an open arena which was unfamiliarto them and their rate and range of movement tracked by digitalrecognition software. Distance, speed and time spent immobile wereanalysed using the AnyMaze™ software. Results were comparedstatistically using SPSS™.

Parallel Rod

The parallel rod test analyses changes in rate and range of movement aswell as coordination. Briefly, animals are placed into a cage at thebottom of which is an electrified grid. If the animal places a footbelow the grid and onto the floor a circuit will be activated and thisabnormal footfall registered as an event. AnyMaze™ tracking softwarealso monitors rate of movement and periods of immobility.

Tremor Testing

Animals were placed in a tremor sensor box and a clear lid placed on topof the box. Movement was monitored for 2 minutes and data recorded usingPowerlab™, ADI Instruments, Australia.

Testing Regime

All animals were subjected to the following test regime encompassingboth behavioural and tremor testing over a defined time period (seeTable 1).

TABLE 1 Testing regime. Time minutes (hours) Test 0 Weight recorded  60(1.0) Tremor test 120 (2.0) Tremor test 180 (3.0) Tremor test  195(3.25) Tremor test 210 (3.5) Tremor test plus novel arena  225 (3.75)Tremor test 240 (4.0) Tremor test plus parallel rod 270 (4.5) Tremortest 330 (5.0) Tremor test 360 (5.5) Tremor test 390 (6.0) Tremor test

At the end of the test period animals were euthanized by barbiturateoverdose prior to perfusion fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde forroutine histopathology and immunohistochemistry and blood analysis ofbromide levels (results not reported as part of this application).

Results

a) Novel Arena Test: Freezing Response Episodes

-   -   Number of freezing episodes while performing the novel arena        test were measured as an indicator of stress. The trend was        towards decreased freezing episodes in animals receiving        treatment with potassium bromide (see FIG. 1).

b) Parallel Rod Touches

-   -   On the parallel rod test, mice had significantly more touches if        they were receiving bromide treatment. Although increased        touches may be exhibited with ataxia these animal show no signs        of ataxia and increased touches likely represent reduced anxiety        about the novel environment (see FIG. 2).

c) Weight Gain

-   -   Under mild stress conditions bromide increased weight gain in        age/sex matched animals as compared to control (see FIG. 3).

Conclusion

Oral potassium bromide causes significant weight gain due to decreasedanxiety and subsequent appetite stimulation in animals undergoingstressful management practices.

EXAMPLE 2 Determination of Pharmacokinetics of Bromide in Sheep AfterSingle Intravenous (IV) and Oral (PO) Doses; Suitability of Bromide forUse as a Therapeutic Agent to Prevent Stress Induced Inanition inRuminant Animals

Procedure

Briefly, sixteen Merino sheep were randomly assigned to two treatmentgroups. The intravenous (IV) group were given 120 mg/kg bromide, assodium bromide. The per os (oral-PO group) were given 120 mg/kg bromide,as potassium bromide. Serum bromide concentrations were determined bycolorimetric spectrophotometry.

Results

In summary, after IV administration the maximum concentration (C_(max))was 822.11±93.61 mg/L, volume of distribution (V_(d)) was 0.286±0.031L/kg and the clearance (Cl) was 0.836±0.255 mL/h/kg. After POadministration the C_(max) was 453.86±43.37 mg/L and the time of maximumconcentration (T_(max)) was 108±125 h. The terminal half-life (t^(1/2))of bromide after IV and PO administration was 387.93±115.35 h and346.72±94.05 h, respectively. The oral bioavailability (F) of bromidewas 92%. No adverse reactions were noted during this study in eithertreatment group. The concentration versus time profiles exhibitedsecondary peaks, suggestive of gastrointestinal cyclic redistribution ofthe drug.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance

When administered PO, bromide in sheep has a long half-life (t^(1/2)) ofapproximately 14 days, with good bioavailability.

Full Materials and Methods

Animals

Sixteen sheep, weighing between 49.5 kg and 67 kg and with an averagebody condition score of >2 were randomly divided into equal number (IVand PO treatment groups). Animals were placed in individual feeding pensand were fed twice daily on a ration of oats and lupins as well as adlibitum hay and water. Estimated chloride content for oats and lupinswas 0.11% and 0.4% respectively.

Indwelling intravenous cannulas (Braun, Certo Splittocan 335, 16 gauge,32 cm) were placed into the left jugular vein and secured with 2/0polypropylene suture. A 25 cm low volume IV extension set (BMDi TUTA,25×m minimal volume IV extension set) was connected to the catheter huband the area was then bandaged.

Sodium bromide (NaBr) (Sigma-Aldrich) and potassium bromide (KBr)(Sigma-Aldrich) solutions were prepared using sterile water. Theprepared NaBr solution was then filtered through a microfilter (0.22μMILLEX GP, Cork, Ireland). Sodium and potassium salts were administeredto dose sheep with 120 mg/kg of Br (154.6 mg/kg NaBr or 178.8 mg/kgKBr). All serum concentrations are for Br. Potassium bromide is the mostreadily available form of Br for oral therapy. Sodium bromide was usedfor the IV study because of cardiotoxicity associated with potassium.Both salts are fully disassociated in solution therefore no PKdifferences were expected.

IV Bromide

NaBr solution was administered through the cephalic vein using a 21gauge needle over a period of 1 minute. Sheep were restrained in aseated position. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 and30 min and then at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 h. Samples thereafterwere collected at 12 h intervals to 240 h then at 24 h intervals to 336h. A final sample was taken at 528 h. For each sample, the initial 2 mLof blood collected was discarded and a sterile syringe used to withdraw5 mL of blood which was then placed into a plain separator blood tube(Vacuette: Greiner Bio-one). The cannulas were flushed with 3 mL of 5%heparinised saline after each collection. Each blood sample was left tostand for 30 min before centrifugation at 2000 g for 5 min. Serum washarvested and stored at −20° C. until analysis.

PO Bromide

KBr solution was administered via an orogastric tube, then flushed with500 mL water. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, 24 h, then at 12 h intervals to 240 h, then at 24 h intervals to 336h. A final sample was taken at 504 h. When collecting blood samples at 1h through to 10 h the rumen was auscultated, over the caudo-dorsal blindsack, to determine if the high salt load affected rumen motility.

Determination of Serum Bromide Concentrations

Serum bromide concentrations were determined by colorimetricspectrophotometry as previously described (Tietz, 1976), with somemodification. Briefly, 0.35 mL of serum was added to 3.15 mL of 10%trichloroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) in a 10 mL centrifuge tube,vortexed, then centrifuged for 15 min at 2000 g. 2.5 mL of supernatantwas then mixed with 0.25 mL of 0.5% Au₂Cl₆ (Sigma-Aldrich) and left tostand for 30 min. Absorbance was measured with a spectrophotometer at440 nm. The standard curve was linear in the range of 25 μg/mL to 5000μg/mL, R²=0.9992. The lower limit of quantification was 25 μg/mL.

Pharmacokinetics

Maximum concentration (C_(max)) of Br and time to C_(max) (T_(max)) weredetermined directly from the data. Other PK parameters were determinedfor each sheep by use of non-compartmental analysis with a commercialsoftware program (Topfit 2.0, Gustav Fischer Verlag). Area under thecurve (AUC_(0-∞)) and area under the first moment curve (AUMC_(0-∞))were calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule (Gibalidi, 1982) theterminal elimination rate constant (λ_(z)) was calculated by means oflog-linear regression.

Whereas parameters C_(max), T_(max), and AUC (where bioavailability isnot absolute) are expected to differ when given IV or PO, t_(1/2) shouldbe the same, regardless of route of administration. A t-test of thehypothesis of no difference between the t_(1/2) population means wasperformed. All results are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD).

Results

All sheep in the PO group exhibited no discernable neurological effects.There was no observed alteration in rumen motility and animals continuedto eat and drink. Assessment of any acute neurological effectscorrelating with peak Br concentration following IV administration wasdifficult as the sheep were held in the seated position throughout theinitial 20 min, for ease of sampling. All IV sheep walked back to theirindividual pens and subjectively observers reported a mild tranquilisingeffect for approximately 1-2 h post-injection.

The relevant non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters derived fromthis study are summarised in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± SD) of bromide afterintravenous and per oral administration to eight sheep at a dose of 120mg/kg. Intravenous administration Oral administration Pharmacokineticvariable (mean ± SD) (mean ± SD) C_(max) (mg/L) 822.11 ± 93.61  453.86 ±43.37  T_(max) (h) —   108 ± 124.86 AUC_(0-∞) (mg*h/L) 157221.8 ±52681.53 143948.9 ± 26156.16 MRT_(0-∞) (h) 545.5 ± 226.1 413.4 ± 150  Cl(mL/h/kg) 0.836 ± 0.255 — V_(d) (L/kg) 0.286 ± 0.031 — V_(z) (L/kg)0.393 ± 0.102 0.388 ± 0.037 t_(1/2) (h) 387.93 ± 115.35 346.72 ± 94.05 F — 0.92

-   -   C_(max), maximum concentration; T_(max), time of maximum        concentration; AUC_(0-∞), area under the curve; MRT_(0-∞)mean        residence time; Cl, clearance; V_(d), volume of distribution,        V_(z), volume of distribution at pseudo-equilibrium; t^(1/2),        terminal elimination half-life; F, oral bioavailability.

The concentration-time profiles for IV and PO serum bromide are shown inFIG. 4 and FIG. 5, respectively.

The t_(1/2) of Br in sheep following PO administration was 14.4 d, theIV t^(1/2) was 16.2 d; however, the difference between groups was notstatistically significant (T=0.7832, df=14, p=0.4466).

An interesting finding in this study was the numerous pronounced peaksin the PO concentration versus time curve following the initialabsorption phase. These peaks approached the C_(max) seen on day one,but occurred many days later (FIG. 5). Indeed, some sheep had T_(max)values well beyond the initial PO absorption phase. Similar althoughsmaller peaks were also seen with IV bromide (FIG. 4).

Study Conclusions

Bromide was absorbed rapidly following PO administration. Prior to thisstudy, it was predicted that absorption might be delayed due todilution, the rumen having an estimated volume of 10 L/45 kg of liveweight (Hinchcliff et al., 1991). However, the C_(max) in this study wassimilar to that measured in horses given a comparable oral Br dose(Raidal and Edwards, 2008). Ruminal epithelial cells express largeconductance channels permeable to chloride (Stumpff et al., 2009) andthe rumen has a high chloride absorptive capacity even against the netelectrochemical gradient for the ion (Dobson and Phillipson, 1958,Scott, 1970). It is likely that these high conductance channels are alsoresponsible for overcoming a relatively lower initial Br concentrationin the ruminal/gastric fluid compared with monogastric species.

The t_(1/2) of Br in sheep, of approximately 14 d, is comparable withhumans' 12 d (Harden et al., 1969) and in the dog 12-24 d (Trepanier andBabish, 1995b,a), but is considerably longer than approximately 3 d inthe horse (Raidal and Edwards, 2008). This long elimination phase is afunction of slow clearance; Br is not metabolised, and is subject toextensive renal tubular reabsorption, the net result being the anion iscontinually recycled throughout the body (Trepanier and Babish, 1995b).

In classic PO pharmacokinetic profiles of monogastric species secondarypeaks are uncommon, and are usually a function of unusual drugmetabolism, in particular entero-hepatic recycling. Bromide, however, isnot metabolised. Possible causative mechanisms are therefore limited toabsorption, distribution and elimination. A Br study conducted inhorses, at a similar PO dose to that used in this study produced aprofile without secondary peaks in serum concentration (Raidal andEdwards, 2008).

Similar secondary peaks were also seen following IV administration,albeit much less pronounced (FIG. 4). However, it is notable that the IVpeaks do appear to occur at similar time points to where they are seenfollowing PO administration

The mean bioavailability of Br in this trial was 92%, which is muchhigher than the estimated bioavailability 32-38% in the horse (Raidaland Edwards, 2008) and 40% in the dog (Trepanier and Babish, 1995b. Thisgreater bioavailability in the sheep is probably due to the prolongedrumen residence time of ingestion (Cunningham et al., 2010).

The V_(d) value of 0.286±0.031 reflects the ECF space (although volumeof distribution figures are not primary measures of physiologicalcompartments, they do often correlate well) and approximates the V_(d)of 0.245 L/kg used as an estimate of ECF in the sheep (Coghlan et al.,1977). The calculated volume of distribution at pseudo-equilibrium(V_(z)), when equilibration with rumen fluid is assumed, was 0.393±0.102and 0.388±0.037 L/kg for IV and PO administration, respectively. Thatthese measures are similar is unsurprising as V_(z) is a proportionalityfactor relating to concentrations during the log-linear phase of drugelimination, from which t^(1/2) is derived.

Volume of distribution is the parameter used to calculate a loading dose(LD), using the equation LD=V*C_(ss), where C_(ss) is concentrationsteady state, or the effective concentration for a particular use (asdetermined by PD studies). The V_(d) value is most appropriate wherebromide is to be given as a PO bolus, and V_(z) in circumstances whereit is to be given over a few days.

Because of the long t^(1/2) following PO administration, the serum Brconcentration fluctuated within a narrow range (approximately 200-400mg/L) for 14 d. This long t^(1/2), with two fold difference between peakand trough values over a two week period confers great potential fortherapeutic application, in particular prophylactic use.

The study dose of Br, 120 mg/kg, resulted in sustained Br concentrationsapproximating 75% of the lower bound of the anticonvulsant range(1.0-2.0 mg/ml) (Podell and Fenner, 1993). Concentrations of Br whichwill prevent, improve appetite or abolish inanition are unknown,although it would be assumed that in all but the most severe cases to besubstantially less than those required to protect against grand malseizures.

Several advantages of Br have now been identified by this study; Br ischeap, easy to administer, has good bioavailability and a long t^(1/2).

REFERENCES

Coghlan J A, Fan J S K, Scoggins B A, Shulkes A A (1977) Measurement ofExtracellular Fluid Volume and Blood Volume in Sheep. Australian Journalof Biological Sciences 30:71-84.

Cunningham F, Elliott J, Lees P (2010) Comparative and veterinarypharmacology: Springer.

Dobson A, and Phillipson A T (1958) The absorption of chloride ions fromthe reticulo-rumen sac. Journal of Physiology-London 140:94-104.

Gibaldi MaP, D. (1982) Pharmacokinetics. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc

Harden R M G, Alexander W, Shimmins J, Chisholm D (1969) A comparisonbetween the gastric and salivary concentration of iodide, pertechnetate,and bromide in man. Gut 10:928.

Hinchcliff K, Jernigan A, Upson D, Constable P (1991) Ruminantpharmacology. The Veterinary Clinics of North America Food AnimalPractice 7:633.

Podell M, and Fenner W R (1993) Bromide therapy in refractory canineidiopathic epilepsy. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 7:318-327.

Raidal S L, and Edwards S (2008) Pharmacokinetics of potassium bromidein adult horses. Aust Vet J 86:187-193.

Scott D (1970) Absorption of chloride from the rumen of the sheep. ResVet Sci 11:291-293.

Stumpff F, Martens H, Bilk S, Aschenbach J, Gabel G (2009) Culturedruminal epithelial cells express a large-conductance channel permeableto chloride, bicarbonate, and acetate. Pflugers Arch—Eur J Physiol457:1003-1022.

Tietz N W (1976) Fundamentals of clinical chemistry.

Trepanier L A, and Babish J G (1995a) Effect of dietary chloride contenton the elimination of bromide by dogs. Res Vet Sci 58:252-255.

Trepanier L A, and Babish J G (1995b) Pharmacokinetic properties ofbromide in dogs after the intravenous and oral administration of singledoses. Res Vet Sci 58:248-251.

EXAMPLE 3 Practice of the Invention in Feedlot Integration

Steers enter the feedlot at 250 to 400 kg live-weight, heifers enter at200 to 375 kg live-weight. The beasts spend the first two weeks is intheir own pen—this period is referred to as induction. As induction isundertaken to reduce the stress of crowding and environment transition,bromide will be administered for part or the entirety of the inductionphase. Provision of bromide during induction phase may occur via asingle drench or injection of bromide 5 to 70% w/w or w/v, or byinclusion of bromide in feed within the range of 0.01 to 5% w/w drymatter; the lower value for a light heifer eating a bromide ration for14 days to deliver a low dose of bromide and the upper value for a heavysteer consuming all bromide in three days to deliver a relatively highdose of bromide. Inclusion of bromide in an antibiotic, growth promotantor mineral pre-mix at 0.1 to 60% w/w is a practical method ofadministering bromide to a total dose of 10 to 500 mg/kg. Afterinduction the beasts are moved into the main feedlot, where in whichthey remain for up to 100 days to be grown out.

EXAMPLE 4 Practice of the Invention in Animal Transport

Animals are dosed with 10 to 500 mg/kg bromide either at the farmimmediately prior to trucking to port, or during the induction phase atthe port prior to boarding. Bromide to be administered by singleinjection or drench of bromide 10-70% w/w or w/v, or by inclusion ofbromide in feed at a concentration of 0.01 to 5% w/w dry matter forthree to five days.

EXAMPLE 5 Practice of the Invention in Mulesing

Lambs are dosed with 10 to 500 mg/kg bromide, administered by singledrench of bromide 5 to 70% w/w or w/v, within 48 hours of marking(including the procedures of mulesing, castration, ear tagging,vaccination and tail docking).

EXAMPLE 6 Practice of Live Export of Sheep

Sheep between the ages of one and three years and weighing between 40and 65 kg, are road transported to a registered premises. Heavier sheep,including rams up to 110 kg are also transported not uncommonly. If thepremises has sheds then they stay a minimum of three days, if going ontopasture they stay a minimum of five days (excluding day of arrival andday of departure). Sheep are to be dosed with 10 to 500 mg/kg bromideeither at the farm immediately prior to trucking to port, or during theinduction phase at the port prior to boarding. Bromide to beadministered by single injection or drench of bromide 10 to 70% w/v orw/w, or by inclusion of bromide in pellets at a concentration of 0.01 to5% w/w dry matter for 3 to 5 days.

EXAMPLE 7 Practice of Shearing Rams

Rams to be dosed with 10 to 500 mg/kg bromide, within 48 hours ofshearing. Bromide to be administered by single injection or drench ofbromide 20 to 70% w/v or w/w.

EXAMPLE 8

Practice of Mulesing in Sheep

One of the most severe management procedures undertaken in sheepproductions systems worldwide in that of mulesing. Mulesing is a routinebreech modification procedure carried out in hard-bodied Merino flockswhere significant amounts of skin growing in the breech region of theanimal are removed to reduce the incidence of breech flystrike (invasionof tissues of the breech area by larval stages of the Australian SheepBlowfly (Lucilla cuprina) later in life). Flystrike is estimated tocause losses to the Australian sheep industry of $280 million annually(2013 figures, see Australian Wool Innovation Limited 2014, andMacKinnon Project 2005) and represents one of the more adverse healthstates observed in sheep production systems in Australia, and is asignificant ethical concern in its own right as it is a condition thatwill inevitably lead to a slow and painful demise if animals are leftuntreated. Mulesing is mainly advocated in Merino lambs which are to beretained in the flock for breeding (replacement ewe lambs or, morerarely, ram lambs) in order to limit losses from breech fly strike inthe flock.

Mulesing is routinely carried out without prior analgesia or anaesthesiawith only application of a spray-on local anaesthetic (e.g. Tri-Solfen,see Lomax et al, 2008) and fly repellent post tissue removal. Recoveryfrom this procedure takes many weeks, due to the often extensive healingrequired for full recovery, and it is widely recognised that growthrates of mulesed lambs can be affected for many months post mulesing inproduction flocks. To add to this insult, mulesing is frequently carriedout in combination with other management procedures including taildocking and marking (removal of testes of male lambs). The acute andchronic pain caused by a surgical procedure without anaesthetic isarguably the most extreme stressor/imposes maximal stress possible in ananimal. This study is a robust test of bromide's efficacy in attenuatingthe negative effects of stress in ruminants.

To determine whether treatment with bromide at time of mulesing couldlimit the negative growth effects routinely observed in Merino flocks inresponse to this significant management procedure, a cohort of ewe lambswas identified which were due to undergo mulesing and tail docking aspart of routine flock husbandry practices. Ewe lambs were either treatedwith bromide (as the potassium salt) orally immediately prior tomulesing and tail docking, or were left untreated, and their weight gainover time compared.

Methodology

A study was undertaken in a self-replacing merino flock to establish theeffect of treatment with oral bromide (300 mg/kg/live weight (LW)) onweight gain post-procedure in Merino ewe lambs undergoing mulesing andtail docking as part of routine flock management practices. A total of40 ewe lambs of approximately six weeks of age entered the trial; 20were subjected to mulesing and tail docking but were not treated withoral bromide with 20 receiving 300 mg/kg/LW bromide orally at time ofprocedure.

Briefly, the lamb is placed on a mulesing cradle with the breech regionpresented to the operator. A sharp pair of breech shears was used tomake swift incisions into the skin of the lamb, removing a tear-shapedarea of skin from the breech on both sides of the tail. Each incisionleaves an area of open flesh approximately 5 to 10 cm in width dependingon the amount of loose skin removed. The tail of the animal is removedto the third palpable joint by incision with hot cauterising ‘gas’shears and skin above the tail also pared back to expose the underlyingtissue.

Animals were weighed on entry to the trial, treated orally withpotassium bromide solution and then immediately subjected to mulesingand tail docking. Tri-Solfen™ (Bayer Animal Health, Gordon, NSW,Australia) was administered post-docking/mulesing to all exposed areasof underlying muscle as per manufacturer's instructions. A controlcohort was subjected to the same procedures but without treatment. Alllambs were then returned to the mob and allowed to mother-up beforereturning to their usual pasture. All lambs in the trial were weightedat 7, 14, 21, 28 and 51 days post procedure. Statistical analysis wascarried out using SPSS™.

Results

A total of 40 ewe lambs of approximately six weeks of age entered thetrial. 20 animals were treated orally with 300 mg/kg LW bromide (as thepotassium salt) immediately prior to mulesing and tail docking, and 20remaining untreated whilst subjected to the same procedure. An exampleof an animal which has just undergone mulesing and tail docking is shownin FIG. 6.

No significant difference was observed in entry weights of treated anduntreated groups to the trial (Day 0 mean live weights: Control group13.36±0.49 kg; bromide treatment group 13.59±0.58 kg). Animals treatedwith oral potassium bromide (300 mg/kg LW) at time of mulesing and taildocking showed a trend towards increased weight gain compared tountreated counterparts over the duration of the trial (51 days). Meanweight gain after 51 days for each group was control 7.52±0.41 kg andbromide treatment group 8.52±0.57 kg respectively (see FIG. 7). Meanlive weight on day 51 of the trial was observed to be 20.89±0.75 kg forcontrol animals and 22.17±0.86 kg for bromide treated animals. Aunivariate pairwise analysis giving a significance of 0.30 (F=1.092) tothis data.

As has been previously suggested, weight loss was observed in bothgroups after seven days (see FIG. 7). After 14 days, however, allanimals had recovered their entry weights with bromide treated animalsbeginning to show enhanced weight gain compared to their untreatedcounterparts.

Live weight gain between the monitoring points (day 7, 14, 28 and 51)showed subtle differences between the treated and untreated lambs.Although both groups lost weight in the first seven days of the trial,the treated animals showed a slightly reduced weight loss compared tountreated controls (Day 1-7 mean weight change (kg): control group:−0.645±0.87 kg; bromide treatment group: −0.564±1.29 kg; see FIG. 8).Bromide treated animals also showed a marginally increased weight gainin the following 7 day period with mean weight gain for the two groupsbetween day 7 and 14 being 1.53±0.21 kg and 1.80±0.30 kg respectively.

Finally, mean weight gain/head/day over the 51 days of the trial wasconsidered (see FIG. 9). Similar to previous data, bromide treatedanimals showed a consistent improvement in weight gain over the durationof the trial equating to a weight gain per head per day of 0.57.

Overall, improvement in weight gain in bromide treated animals equatedto a 11% increase in production gain over the duration of the trial (51days—control group live weight gain=0.14 kg per head per day; bromidetreatment group=0.16 kg per head per day).

These data equate to a measureable improvement in live weight gain aftermulesing and tail docking in live weight gain in ewe lambs, particularlyin the Merino breed. Early weight gain will equate to a final differencein adult weight over the same time period if animals are on the sameplane of nutrition equating to a higher body condition score at time ofjoining which can directly translate into improved production outcomesoverall.

REFERENCES

Managing breech flystrike. (2014). Australian Wool Innovation Limited.Sydney, Australia.

Report on likely increased prevalence of breech strike and increasedmortalities from flystrike if sheep were not mulesed. (2005) MacKinnonProject. University of Melbourne.

Lomax, S., Sheil, M., Windsor, P. A. Impact of topical anaesthesia onpain alleviation and wound healing in lambs after mulesing. (2008).Australian Veterinary Journal. 86:5 159-168.

It will be understood that the invention disclosed and defined in thisspecification extends to all alternative combinations of two or more ofthe individual features mentioned or evident from the text or drawings.All of these different combinations constitute various alternativeaspects of the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for the preparation of an animal prior to subjecting the animal to a marketing or management practice, thereby preventing the induction of stress-related inanition or anxiety-related inanition in the animal during, or at completion of, the marketing or management practice, the method including the step of administering a formulation including bromide to an animal selected for the marketing or management practice prior to subjecting the animal to a management or marketing practice in an amount effective for preventing the animal from reducing feed intake, wherein the animal does not have stress-related inanition or anxiety-related inanition at the time of administration of the formulation.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the animal is a ruminant animal.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the ruminant animal is ovine or bovine.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the marketing or management practice is a husbandry practice selected from the group consisting of mulesing, castration, tail docking, marking, dehorning, animal transport and introduction of the animal into a feedlot.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the formulation provides bromide in an amount of about 10 to about 750 mg/kg animal weight.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the formulation is provided once prior to subjecting the animal to a marketing or management practice.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the formulation is provided daily for a period of one day to no more than about four weeks prior to subjecting the animal to a marketing or management practice.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the formulation is provided orally.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the formulation is provided in the form of a drench.
 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the formulation includes magnesium bromide or potassium bromide at a concentration of about 5 to about 70% w/w. 